By Dana Finnegan, Senior Product Consultant, MDaudit
LinkedIn: Dana Finnegan
LinkedIn: MDaudit
Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) have been a cornerstone of hospital reimbursement systems for decades, serving as a case-mix complexity system that categorizes patients with similar clinical diagnoses. While essential for aligning hospital resources with patient needs, DRG downgrades pose a significant challenge for healthcare organizations, directly impacting revenue and creating compliance risks. Effectively managing DRG downgrades is key to maintaining financial health and compliance, and technology plays a critical role in simplifying and optimizing this process.
What Is a DRG Downgrade?
A DRG downgrade occurs when an initially assigned DRG, which determines the reimbursement amount for a patient’s hospital stay, is reduced. This can happen for various reasons, such as coding errors, incomplete documentation, or payer audits. DRG downgrades result in lower reimbursement than initially anticipated, leading to revenue shortfalls and increased scrutiny.
The Financial Impact of DRG Downgrades
Healthcare organizations face substantial financial consequences when DRGs are downgraded. Inaccurate documentation, coding, and payer audits can lead to significant revenue loss. These losses are compounded when downgrades are recurrent and not dealt with in a timely manner. Ultimately, this erodes revenue integrity and forces healthcare providers to divert attention and resources to appeal processes and rectify errors.
In this complex environment, maintaining accuracy and compliance while ensuring optimal reimbursement is more important than ever. This is where technology-driven solutions come into play.
The Role of Technology in Managing DRG Downgrades
Detection and Identification of At-risk DRGs
Manually auditing DRGs can be time-consuming and error-prone. However, modern healthcare platforms that offer continuous risk-monitoring solutions -these platforms can leverage analytics and benchmarking to identify DRGs billed outside normative ranges. This alerts revenue integrity and billing compliance teams to swiftly take action via integrated workflows to ensure that DRGs are submitted with the highest level of accuracy and integrity, thus reducing the potential for downgrades.
Even with the best analytics, DRG downgrades can still happen. When they do, an integrated workflow for payer audits can step in and save the day.
Payer Audit Workflows
An integrated workflow and centralized platform for payer audits can help streamline third-party requests. Eliminating the manual effort of tracking requests, pulling records, reporting results, and staying on top of documentation due dates.
The benefits of such a workflow include:
- Optimizing response time to external audit requests (government and commercial)
- Automating manual tasks to ensure deliverables during challenging appeal deadlines
- Recognizing successful appeals and reducing refunds to ensure revenue protection
- Gain full transparency via data analytics to understand which payers are downgrading and which DRGs are the most at-risk.
- esMD – Electronic submission of medical documentation ensures the timely filing of all Additional Documentation Requests (ADRs) and supporting appeals documentation. Creating a single point of submission and tracking for audit responses. This allows your team to optimize response times to external requesters and save significant printing, faxing, labor, and mailing costs.
Two leading causes of DRG downgrades are incomplete documentation and not meeting medical necessity.
As DRG downgrades continue to pose challenges, with a spotlight on increased downgrades from commercial payers. Leveraging technology is the most effective way to mitigate risks and protect revenue. With the right tools, healthcare organizations can stay compliant, improve coding accuracy, and optimize reimbursements for every case.
This article was originally published on the MDaudit blog and is republished here with permission.