Modifications to MIPS by the “Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018”

By Tom S. Lee, PhD, Founder & CEO, SA Ignite
Twitter: @saignite
View ABCs of the QPP: MIPS Cost: Why Start Now and What to Do? Plus Washington Update
At HIMSS18: Visit them in Booth 2874 this year in Las Vegas.

Overview
The Further Extension of Continuing Appropriations Act, 2018 (HR1892) (officially renamed the “Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018”) enacted by the United States Congress and President Trump on February 9, 2018 extends the transition years for MIPS to include 2019, 2020 and 2021. This goes beyond the 2017 and 2018 transition years CMS allocated per the original MACRA legislation. There are also some changes included in the Act that apply to the 2018 MIPS performance year.

What Changes

  • Post-transition now begins in 2022, not 2019 and includes key requirements.
    • In 2022 the MIPS performance threshold must be the mean or median of national historical MIPS scores
    • The MIPS cost category must be weighted at 30% of the score
  • During the extended transition years of 2019 – 2021, the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary shall:
    • annually increase the MIPS performance threshold in a “gradual and incremental transition” towards the value mandated for 2022 (the first post-transition year),
    • set the MIPS Cost category weight to be between 10% and 30%, and
    • not factor year-to-year MIPS Cost improvement into the MIPS score for 2018 and extended transition years.
  • Beginning with the 2018 performance year, the MIPS payment adjustment percentage will be applied only to Medicare Part B “covered professional services”. That means, most prominently, no MIPS payment adjustment for Part B drugs. Hence, MIPS financial incentives and penalties in absolute dollars will be reduced somewhat by this change. Stay tuned for updates to our MIPS Financial Calculator where we account for the anticipated impact of these and other changes wrought by the Act.
  • Similarly, beginning with the 2018 performance year, the low-volume exclusion for MIPS will now only be based on “covered professional services”, rather than items as well, such as Part B drugs. Hence, the low-volume exclusion will exclude somewhat more clinicians than before. This assumes that the dollar amount and patient count thresholds of the exclusion set by CMS remain as they are ($90k and 200 patients, respectively) in the 2018 QPP Final Rule.

What Remains the Same

  • The schedule of maximum MIPS penalties for low performance or non-participation without a MIPS exclusion does not change
    • -5% for the 2018 performance year
    • -7% for 2019
    • -9% for 2020 and beyond
  • CMS will still publicize MIPS scores, category scores, and 5-star performance ratings of quality measures. More than half-a-million clinicians’ scores will be publicly reported during 4Q 2018 for the 2017 performance year.
  • The compliance and reporting requirements for Quality, advancing care information (ACI) and improvement activities (IA) do not change, although Quality benchmarks will likely continue to rise.

Key Takeaways

  • MIPS is here to stay. This Act reinforces CMS’ position that MIPS is a catalyst to move from FFS to value-based care. It further entrenches the MIPS program.
  • Clinicians may stay in MIPS longer. Easing the ramp up of the MIPS program may result in more clinicians and organizations deciding to remain in MIPS longer rather than entering an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM). MIPS becomes a safer sandbox or “spring training” for clinicians to develop and practice value-based care improvement strategies before moving to more aggressive programs such as APMs.
  • CMS continues to drive continuous MIPS performance improvement. The Act requires CMS to continue to increase the MIPS performance threshold year-over-year to reach the required national mean or median by 2022. In the 2018 QPP Final Rule, CMS predicts that 74% of eligible clinicians will have scores of greater than 70 for 2018. For the 2022 performance threshold, if the historical national mean or median were to be, say, 75 points, then the average annual increase in the threshold from 2019 to 2022 would be 15 points per year, enough to encourage continuous improvement.
  • MIPS compliance and complexity persist. As the growing MIPS penalty remains, MIPS compliance will remain important. MIPS regulations and requirements will continue to be updated annually and semi-annually, making it essential for organizations stay on top of the program.
  • MIPS Cost will grow in importance. MIPS Cost remains at least at 10% until it must be 30% in 2022. This confirms CMS’ commitment to making cost performance part of MIPS.
  • MIPS public reporting is on track. As CMS projected, more than half-a-million clinicians’ 2017 MIPS scores and quality measures will continue to be publicly-reported in 2018 through the Physician Compare website or through a freely downloadable file. The reputational impacts of MIPS remain intact and are even more important as providers stay in MIPS for a longer period of time.

This article was originally published on SA Ignite and is republished here with permission.